Why did Samsung play it protected with the Galaxy S5’s processor?

Why did Samsung play it safe with the Galaxy S5's processor?

Of all of the telephone producers on the market, Samsung appears to have a specific expertise for creating an anticlimax. Our first thought when holding the Galaxy S5 was that we would been by means of all this earlier than a yr in the past, with the equally underwhelming launch of the GS4. Our disappointment jibed with the reactions of different bloggers round us at Cellular World Congress and with many readers’ feedback on our arms-on article. People appeared to overlook concerning the telephone after 5 minutes and change their consideration to Samsung’s new smartwatches, particularly the delectable Gear Match.

First impressions aren’t every little thing, nevertheless. A telephone’s allure can take some time to sink in, and also you solely have to take a look at the Galaxy S3 for proof of that. (I reviewed that handset many moons in the past, and should admit that I by no means anticipated it to do in addition to it did.) As add-ons go, the swipe-based mostly fingerprint scanner and coronary heart fee monitor is probably not astounding now that we have had the HTC One Max and health devices just like the Withings Pulse, however they could show their utility in time. Even when they do not, the GS5 has different redeeming options, comparable to its 1080p AMOLED show, part-detection autofocus and primary water resistance, and it comes at simply the correct time to win over GS3 house owners whose contracts are coming to an finish.

However the anticlimax is there nonetheless, and it most certainly stems from a suspicion that Samsung’s huge scale and manufacturing power is not being absolutely exploited. Like Apple, however in contrast to most different telephone makers, Samsung has management over many various applied sciences that go right into a smartphone, together with the reminiscence, show and — most significantly — the processor. It confirmed us glimpses of this cross-self-discipline experience with the worldwide variations of the Galaxy S2 and S3, whose in-home Exynos processors introduced additional velocity and graphics simply when Android wanted it, and it did one thing comparable with the large-screened, stylus-outfitted Galaxy Word collection. However the GS5, just like the GS4, appears a lot much less distinctive, and so maybe what we ought to be asking is that this: Why is not Samsung capable of muster its in-home assets to create one thing really totally different? And that, at the least, is a query we will start to reply.


Why did Samsung play it safe with the Galaxy S5's processor?

Not everybody believes in destiny, however I do, at the very least when it comes to smartphones. I feel that each handset’s future is basically decided by its processor. If its processor is exclusive, a telephone might be smarter than another. But when the processor is shared with rival merchandise, then a telephone should include convincing peripheral options if it is to have any shot at greatness.

Neither Sony nor Nokia have the potential to create distinctive processors, in order that they’ve correctly thrown their weight behind helpful extras, similar to class-main digital camera modules and standout design. These corporations are restricted within the applied sciences they will create, however the specter of extinction has pressured them to combine their departments and collect collectively each little bit of know-how at their disposal.

Apple, in the meantime, has spent years engaged on its A7 chip. This allowed it to make core enhancements to all areas of the iPhone 5S: a brand new sixty four-bit structure to spice up general efficiency with no value to battery life; a brand new picture sign processor to assist the autofocus and multi-publicity efficiency of the digital camera; and a brand new coprocessor that permits the 5S to work as an efficient health tracker without having for a separate accent. Even when Apple has absorbed innovations from outdoors, it has both acquired the inventor (as within the case of AuthenTec and its fingerprint scanner) or it has established lengthy-time period contracts that give it the liberty to tailor a product to its exact wants (as within the case of Creativeness Applied sciences and its GPU).

Within the case of the Galaxy S5’s processor, nevertheless, Samsung merely went purchasing. It made positive to purchase the most effective, within the type of a extremely overclocked model of Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 800 chip (referred to as the MSM8974AC or Snapdragon 801), however finally that is only a marginally quicker model of the chip inside Sony’s Xperia Z2 (the MSM8974AB). In flip, the Z2’s chip is simply an overclocked model of the unique Snapdragon 800 (MSM8974) discovered within the Galaxy Notice three, Xperia Z1 and Nexus 5.

“Within the case of the Galaxy S5’s processor, Samsung merely went purchasing”

We should always subsequently anticipate the GS5 to have nice efficiency and battery life, identical to these different Snapdragon-outfitted telephones, however with no actual scope for deep-degree integration that would make it stand out from its rivals. As one Qualcomm consultant whispered to me: The GS5 has a daily off-the-shelf Snapdragon, largely the identical as anyone else’s, besides with extra “bragging rights.”

Samsung’s reliance on Qualcomm made sense with the Galaxy S4 and American variations of the GS3, as a result of these handsets got here within the midst of the disruption brought on by LTE. The Snapdragon line shortly gained a status as the most effective worth, most dependable and most effective chip for 4G, and the remainder of the cellular silicon business was caught napping by Qualcomm’s adroitness, so it appeared unfair to select on Samsung’s semiconductor enterprise particularly. However as time has gone on, and different silicon gamers like MediaTek and Intel have began to meet up with their LTE help, Samsung’s tardiness has grow to be more durable to know; the one solution to discover out extra is to speak to the Exynos individuals themselves.

The opposite Samsung

Why did Samsung play it safe with the Galaxy S5's processor?

Distant from the clamor of Samsung Cellular’s important stall at MWC, I got here throughout a quiet part that had been reserved for the element aspect of Samsung’s enterprise, which includes Exynos. There I met VP Kyushik Hong, from a division referred to as System LSI (LSI stands for “Giant Scale Integration”), who gave me a rundown of his group’s newest creation: the Exynos 5422, which can energy Asian variants of the GS5.

I ought to point out that I’ve developed a gentle spot for Exynos chips through the years, as a result of they’ve robust gaming efficiency they usually’ve tended to be accompanied by audio circuitry that does good issues for music playback. However the brand new Exynos takes issues additional, by including options which might be ripe for integration. The 5422 helps one thing referred to as “lively hibernation,” for instance, which may scale back a smartphone’s energy consumption by 10 % by not refreshing pixels on the show besides when they should change — one thing that solely works when the chip is paired with a Samsung-made show panel. For a telephone that in all probability lasts round 10 hours on a cost, even an additional hour of battery life represents an enormous enchancment, however it’s one which might be absent from Western variations of the GS5.

“An additional hour of battery life represents an enormous enchancment, however it’s one which can be absent from Western variations of the GS5″

Hong did his greatest to elucidate this predicament with out getting himself or his colleagues into hassle. He informed me that it is a “false impression” that Exynos-based mostly smartphones are inefficient on the subject of LTE. As an alternative, the rationale Samsung Cellular makes use of Qualcomm’s chips quite than Samsung ones has extra to do with worth: Snapdragons merge the LTE modem with the primary processor, which reduces prices, but in addition — Hong believes — leads to “de-featured” chips. Conversely, Exynos is a “excessive-finish premium” chip that intentionally retains the modem and processor separate for the sake of efficiency, even when the upper worth is a turnoff to Samsung Cellular.

Once I requested why Samsung does not implement cooperation between its cellular and processor arms, for the sake of creating a extra built-in gadget, the top of selling for Samsung Semiconductor, Thomas Arenz, stepped into the dialog to remind me of an important reality: Samsung’s element enterprise cannot interact in any type of particular relationship with Samsung Cellular for worry of dropping the belief of different corporations that purchase Exynos chips or different elements. In different phrases, it is about so far as you will get from approach Apple’s numerous departments work collectively.

“There isn’t any mechanism to make sure an Exynos chip results in a Galaxy telephone”

“It is less than us which hardware results in which telephone,” Arenz stated. “There is no assured mechanism to make sure an Exynos chip results in a Galaxy telephone. It isn’t all the time a worth situation; typically it is an availability situation, however the contract goes to the one who makes the perfect supply.

“Our pals [inside Samsung] are a number of the fiercest clients we’ve to cope with.”


Why did Samsung play it safe with the Galaxy S5's processor?

So, why did Samsung play it protected with the Galaxy S5? The primary and most blatant reply is that it was incapable of doing anything, as a result of the entity we name “Samsung” nonetheless sees itself as a element maker as a lot as a telephone maker; a conglomerate slightly than a unified pressure. Put in a different way, the GS5 is made not by Samsung, however by Samsung Cellular: a a lot smaller group that’s tasked with making the perfect telephone it will probably utilizing off-the-shelf elements. This subsidiary lacks particular entry to Samsung’s different areas of R&D, which suggests it has no extra clout or management than HTC, Nokia or Sony. Based on this view, there’s little scope for change and we should always merely mood our expectations earlier than the subsequent telephone launch.

One other, extra speculative reply is that Samsung is working towards higher integration, nevertheless it wants to unravel issues with Exynos first. Work could also be in progress to enhance yields or scale back prices in its semiconductor enterprise, and maybe it will result in a extra joined-up, homegrown system at a later date, within the type of the Word four, GS6 or perhaps even the rumored premium version “Galaxy F.” As to what such a tool may supply, past what’s presently obtainable, we’re definitely not asking for something gimmicky, like a past-HD panel or 4K video recording. Quite the opposite, it will simply be good if Samsung might collect up its experience and produce a delicate however elementary enchancment in battery life, or equally another helpful function that we did not anticipate and that no different Android producer might have completed.

 Disguise Feedback zeroFeedback

<a href=”http://www.engadget.com/merchandise/samsung/galaxy/s5/”> Samsung Galaxy S5 </a>

  • Key specs
  • <a href=”http://www.engadget.com/merchandise/samsung/galaxy/s5/” title=”Samsung Galaxy S5 critiques” goal=”_blank”> Evaluations 24 </a>
  • Costs
  • Discussions
  • Sort Smartphone
  • Working system Android (KitKat [4.4])
  • Display measurement 5.1 inches
  • Inner reminiscence sixteen GB
  • Carriers (US) AT&T
  • Dimensions 5.fifty nine x 2.eighty five x zero.32 in
  • Weight 5.eleven oz
  • Launched 2014-04-eleven

see all specs →

eight.threecommon consumer score
  • Reception and name high quality eight.eight
  • Show eight.9
  • Battery life eight.eight
  • Digital camera 9
  • Ease of use 7.7
  • Design and type issue 6.9
  • Portability (measurement / weight) eight.three
  • Media help eight.5
  • Sturdiness eight.three
  • Ecosystem (apps, equipment, and so on.) 7.9

Get higher evaluations from individuals who even have this product!

write a evaluationsee all critiques →

Displaying costs for mannequin:

AT&T 16GB-BlackAT&T 16GB-WhiteDash 16GB-BlackDash 16GB-WhiteVerizon 16GB-White

  • Why did Samsung play it safe with the Galaxy S5's processor? + tax & delivery Purchase now
  • Why did Samsung play it safe with the Galaxy S5's processor? on contract Purchase now
  • Overstock.com + tax & delivery Purchase now
  • Featured Tales
    Examine Your Devices

    Why did Samsung play it safe with the Galaxy S5's processor?

    Immediately examine merchandise aspect by aspect and see which one is greatest for you!

    Attempt it now →