The Pax 2 vaporizer makes its predecessor look half-baked
I instantly fell in love with the unique Pax vaporizer when it debuted again in 2012. Its compact and light-weight development belied a strong three-stage conduction oven, whereas the glossy, push-button design made it much more intuitive and consumer-pleasant than different moveable vaporizers obtainable on the time. Granted, the OG Pax wasn’t good — what with its behavior of clogging each few periods or so. Now, greater than two years after the discharge of the primary Pax, Ploom is again with a brand new iteration that is smaller, lighter and extra highly effective than its predecessor. Say hiya to the Pax 2.
Earlier than we get into why the Pax 2 is so nice, it might assist to debate the place the primary Pax fell brief. Regardless of being mild-years forward of different moveable vaping techniques of the day like, say, the Magic-Flight Launch Field, the primary Pax was not good. For one factor, customers needed to toggle the unit’s energy by clicking the extendable mouthpiece. Sadly, even sparing use of the system proved sufficient to clog the vapor pathway with sticky resin, thereby making it almost inconceivable to function. And because you could not flip the unit on, there was no technique of heating up the air pathway to loosen the resin and pull out the mouthpiece.
What’s extra, the form of the mouthpiece itself prevented you from prying it off manually. Once I reviewed the unique mannequin, I truly clogged my check unit so badly (and so shortly) that Ploom needed to ship me a alternative unit simply to complete the evaluation. There have been additionally a few smaller, niggling issues just like the simply scuffed plastic casing and finicky temperature ranges.
The Pax 2, nevertheless, suffers from none of those considerations. In truth, it seems to be like Ploom particularly targeted on fixing these points when designing the brand new unit. At lower than 4 inches lengthy, the Pax 2 is considerably shorter than the unique. It additionally weighs a pair grams lower than the primary one. General, the Pax 2 is 25 % smaller and 10 % lighter than the primary. That does not, nevertheless, make the Pax 2, with its lack of shifting exterior elements, really feel any much less sturdy and strong. In truth, the brand new unit’s brushed aluminum casing (out there in 4 colours: charcoal, platinum, topaz, flare) is way much less susceptible to scuffs and scratches.
The brand new mouthpiece is, fairly merely, implausible. Slightly than a bodily mechanism that may be gummed up with resin, the Pax 2 makes use of a small, rubberized pad that doubles as a contact-delicate energy and temperature-setting button. It might appear bizarre initially, particularly should you’re accustomed to the unique’s exterior mouthpiece, however this new type is way simpler to make use of, seals higher and will not sear your lips. I, for one, actually just like the flush-mounted mouthpiece. It not solely pops off the unit and will get misplaced in my bag/pockets far much less typically, but in addition helps stealthily conceal what the Pax 2 truly is. I imply, with the unique Pax, it was fairly apparent what I used to be vaping each time I prolonged the mouthpiece. However that is far more delicate, perhaps much more so than its rival — the Firefly.
I used to be very impressed by the vapor high quality of the brand new Pax 2, which acquired downright milky on the two highest temperature settings.
The Pax 2’s heater can also be vastly superior to the unique’s. When you wanted to take away the mouthpiece and press a tiny button on the inside of the unit on the primary Pax, the Pax 2 merely requires you to lengthy-press the facility button to convey up the temperature-choice menu, after which faucet it to cycle by way of the 4 warmth settings. So. A lot. Simpler. Moreover, the primary Pax’s oven design typically brought about the underside plate to warmth greater than the edges or prime, which resulted in scorching — exactly what you do not need to have occur. However the Pax 2’s chrome steel oven, which is each deeper and wider, heats extra evenly with minimal scorching. General, I used to be very impressed by the vapor high quality of the brand new Pax 2, which acquired downright milky on the two highest temperature settings with out tasting harsh or smoky. You’ll in all probability have to fiddle together with your puffing method a bit to get probably the most out of every hit; go for a mild cigar-type puff, not a pointy inhale such as you’re clearing a binger.
Far and away the most important efficiency enchancment includes the Pax’s battery life. The unique Pax battery lasted for 4, perhaps 5 periods earlier than requiring a 3-hour stint on its charging dock. The Pax 2 requires about the identical period of time to completely recharge (round two to 3 hours), however because of a vastly improved inner accelerometer, which turns off the heater the second you set it down, the brand new unit lasts for almost twice as many periods between fees that its predecessor. I averaged seven to 9 periods per cost over the course of this check. This implies I can now head out for the night with out worrying if my vaporizer will final, or if I ought to have introduced a backup pipe.
Be warned, the pocket-sized Pax 2 carries a considerable $280 price ticket. That is 30 bucks greater than the unique Pax (though that mannequin is at present being discounted right down to $200) and is on par with the $270 Firefly and $260 Arizer Air. Whereas the Pax 2 does not warmth immediately just like the Firefly or supply an aromatherapy perform just like the Arizer, its mixture of ease-of-use, portability, spectacular battery life and vapor high quality make it nicely value testing.