Man discovered not responsible after confiscating his baby's iPhone
Oli Scarff/Getty Photographs
You’ll be able to safely say that you’ve management over your youngsters’ units once you’re dwelling with them, nevertheless it’s trickier for those who cut up up together with your companion and share custody — and one former couple simply discovered this the onerous means. A Dallas decide has discovered Ronald Jackson not responsible of a theft cost filed after he took his daughter’s iPhone 4S (purchased by his ex-companion, Michelle Steppe) as punishment for a impolite telephone message and refused to offer it again. There simply wasn’t sufficient proof to pursue the case, the decide stated.
Suffice it to say that Steppe does not agree with the ruling. Whereas she accepts that Jackson had the authority to confiscate the telephone whereas his daughter was visiting, she believes that energy ended the second his daughter left his custody. This wasn’t Jackson’s property to maintain, Steppe argues, even when it did train the kid a lesson about etiquette. Nevertheless you see the case, it is clear that you simply’re kicking a hornet’s nest the second you determine that policing your child’s system use trumps questions of possession.