FCC refuses to pressure web sites to honor Do Not Monitor requests
The FCC has dismissed a petition filed by California nonprofit Shopper Watchdog, asking the fee to require “edge suppliers” to honor Do Not Monitor requests. The group named Google, Fb, YouTube, Pandora, Netflix and LinkedIn as examples of edge suppliers, which suggests it needs these web sites to permit individuals to make use of their providers with out giving them their knowledge in change. See, even in the event you allow your browser’s Do Not Monitor choice to choose out of third-get together monitoring by advertisers and the like, web sites can select to not honor it. If the petition handed, it will have modified that.
In accordance with Ars Technica, Shopper Watchdog needs the FCC to impose privateness guidelines on web sites just like those outlined underneath Part 222 of the Communications Act. When the FCC was hashing out the particulars of broadband reclassification right into a public utility, that part requiring web service suppliers to guard subscribers’ knowledge initially made it into the listing of provisions to impose.
The group wrote in its petition:
Many shoppers are as involved — or maybe much more nervous — concerning the on-line monitoring and knowledge assortment practices of edge suppliers. As a result of actions by edge suppliers pose the identical menace to widespread broadband adoption as any privateness follow of broadband Web entry service suppliers, the Fee ought to, along with the CPNI guidelines it intends to undertake, promulgate guidelines defending the unauthorized use of shoppers’ private info by requiring edge suppliers to honor “Do Not Monitor” Requests.
Nevertheless, because the company defined in its response, it determined to not undertake Part 222 briefly whereas it figures out the right way to apply it to web service suppliers. Or, within the FCC’s personal phrases, “pending adoption of guidelines to control broadband Web entry service in a separate rulemaking continuing.” It additionally clarified that it isn’t “regulating the Web, per se, or any Web purposes or content material” by reclassifying broadband.
[Image credit: Getty/William Andrew]