Don't name Timex's Ironman One GPS+ a 'smartwatch' (palms-on)

Don't call Timex's Ironman One GPS+ a 'smartwatch' (hands-on)

The final time we considered Timex, we have been nonetheless utilizing landlines and adjusting the monitoring on the VCR in order that Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles II: The Secret of the Ooze would show correctly. Keep in mind “Indiglo”? That is nonetheless a factor, apparently! Anyway, Timex is making a smartwatch, although it isn’t fairly the identical type of smartwatch that the likes of Samsung and Apple are providing. It is extra “health band” than smartwatch, although it does have the power to make telephone calls (emergency calls, anyway) and act as a GPS. I am gonna name it a “crossover” smartwatch: it is acquired a ruggedized exterior able to diving 50 meters (one hundred fifty ft) beneath water, a 3G worldwide connection offered (free for one yr, $forty/yr after) by AT&T, 4GB of inner storage (for music), and a tiny (1.5-inch, Mirasol) display. It is also dramatically costlier than different smartwatches/health bands on the market at $399 for the bottom mannequin. However perhaps it is tremendous rad? We visited Timex reps in New York Metropolis this afternoon to seek out out.

The primary, most essential factor to find out about Timex’s Ironman One GPS+ is that it is not likely a smartwatch. Are individuals going to match it to smartwatches? Sure, sure they’re. Timex insists it isn’t a smartwatch. What’s it? It is a actually costly well being band. It is a “sports activities health” gadget. However it’s not a smartwatch.

I can corroborate that evaluation, as nothing concerning the Timex Ironman One GPS+ feels like a smartwatch. It is received a ruggedized exterior. It is received 4 appropriately rugged buttons. It is received a 1.5-inch Mirasol touchscreen, which seems and operates extra Ironman than Galaxy Gear. The strap is hard rubber. Every thing concerning the One GPS+ seems to be and seems like a sports activities system.

Don't call Timex's Ironman One GPS+ a 'smartwatch' (hands-on)

That sadly consists of the software program, which is sluggish and naked bones. Should you’re used to the world of GPS watches and well being/health wearables, the One GPS+ will really feel proper at house on this respect. The software program’s performance delivers; however the expertise utilizing it? Not a lot. As such, Timex has offloaded a lot of the gadget’s settings to an internet-app, which then wirelessly pushes these settings to your watch by way of that 3G AT&T connection. This lets you add contacts and subsequently set these contacts as “Angels” (individuals who can monitor you for security functions), to dump saved knowledge, and to sync that knowledge with quite a lot of health apps. That is actually the story of most smartwatches/health wearables: restricted performance on the gadget itself, with a related pc to deal with superb tuning. It is a strong answer, however feels increasingly like a workaround as these units get increasingly complicated.

As an example! It can save you as much as 4GB of music on the One GPS+. However who needs to navigate that many songs on a 1.5-inch display with finicky contact? Contact controls work fantastic on a watch when all you are doing is beginning and stopping a timer. Relating to scrolling via hundreds of songs to seek out one, I am extra inclined to stay with my telephone.

Don't call Timex's Ironman One GPS+ a 'smartwatch' (hands-on)

So, why does Timex’s Ironman One GPS+ value $four hundred? An AT&T rep informed me that this system ought to actually be in comparison with different GPS wearables available on the market relatively than smartwatches. In that respect, it is priced competitively — Garmin’s equal is $450 for the bottom mannequin. So, in the event you’re out there for a transportable GPS health watch, Timex’s new gadget could also be an honest deal.

For the remainder of us who examine this to the numerous different wearable monitoring units, it is a very, very expensive smartwatch with comparatively restricted performance. And that is advantageous — this is not actually for us.